Relatives' Heartache Over Coastal Degradation Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.
An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards
The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Past
One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”
“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril
Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.
“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”
In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”
Seeking Solutions and Certainty
The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.
“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”
It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.